Varano Et Ux. v. Home Mut. Fire Ins. Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hirt, J.,
Plaintiffs were the owners of the west one-half of a double house in the Borough of Kulpmont, County of Northumberland at 926 Scott Street. They, with their children, occupied the house as a dwelling. The building was insured “against all direct loss or damage by fire” in two policies issued by defendant Home Mutual Fire Insurance Company for a total of $2,900. Their household goods were similarly insured in a third policy by the same company for $1,500 and for $1,000 in a policy of the other defendant, Protection Mutual Fire Insurance Company. The premises and contents…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fedas v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Meholiff v. River Transit CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Tannenbaum v. Connecticut Fire Ins.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Harbridge Et Ux. v. Mut. Fire Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Brown v. McNamaraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Glens Falls Insurance v. Linwood ElevatorMississippi Supreme Court · 1961
- Guarantee Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. Home Mutual Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Kellman v. McShainSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951