Tannenbaum v. Connecticut Fire Ins.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Rhodes, J.,
Plaintiff instituted actions in assumpsit against defendants on three policies of fire insurance. The three cases were tried together and resulted in a verdict totaling $2,000, with interest, apportioned between the respective defendants.
Plaintiff’s statements of claim averred that a fire occurred on plaintiff’s premises on October 12, 1931, causing a loss to plaintiff in the sum of $3,500. The affidavits of defense filed by defendants set up two defenses: (1) That the loss was caused by explosion and not by fire; and (2) that there was no waiver of filing of proofs of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mitchell v. Potomac InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Transatlantic Fire Insurance v. DorseyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1881
- Briggs v. North American & Mercantile InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Trexler Lumber Co. v. Allemannia Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Heuer v. North Western National Insurance Co. of MilwaukeeIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Allen v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Commonwealth v. BristowSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Marks v. Lumbermen's Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Kellman v. McShainSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Harbridge Et Ux. v. Mut. Fire Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.