Brown v. McNamara
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Ross, J.,
This is an action in trespass for the recovery of damage to an automobile owned and operated by the plaintiff. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff but the court below en banc, the trial judge dissenting, entered judgment n. o. v. on defendant’s motion, and plaintiff appealed to this court. The sole issue before us is whether under all the evidence the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law.
It is a familiar principle of law and of appellate review that on a rule for judgment n. o. v. the testimony must be read in the light most favorable…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Adams v. GardinerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Kulka v. NemirovskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Murphy v. Bernheim & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Altomari v. KrugerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Christ v. Hill Metal & Roofing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jordan v. KennedySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Dandridge v. Exhibitors Service Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Craig v. Gottlieb Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Habel v. LongeneckerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Varano Et Ux. v. Home Mut. Fire Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.