Legal Opinion

Latourette v. County Court

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1927PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, J.

The resolution provided for in Section 4556, Or. L., must contain substantially the same statement of facts as a petition of freeholders for the same purpose, excepting the particulars noted in said Section 4556. The resolution, therefore, must contain a description of the particular manner in which said road is to be altered, widened, straightened or relocated, as the case may be, and the public necessity therefor: Section 5441, Or. L. The petition under investigation, so far as material to the determination of the instant case, is as follows:

“In the Matter of the altering, widening and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lauderback v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Keane v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Steiwer v. SteiwerOregon Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nyman v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Nyman v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  3. Harris v. Board of County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 1956
  4. State Highway Commission v. Pacific Shore Land Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Gregor v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API