Latourette v. County Court
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, J.
The resolution provided for in Section 4556, Or. L., must contain substantially the same statement of facts as a petition of freeholders for the same purpose, excepting the particulars noted in said Section 4556. The resolution, therefore, must contain a description of the particular manner in which said road is to be altered, widened, straightened or relocated, as the case may be, and the public necessity therefor: Section 5441, Or. L. The petition under investigation, so far as material to the determination of the instant case, is as follows:
“In the Matter of the altering, widening and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lauderback v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1924
- Keane v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1925
- Steiwer v. SteiwerOregon Supreme Court · 1924
3Cited by7 opinions
- Nyman v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Nyman v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- Harris v. Board of County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 1956
- State Highway Commission v. Pacific Shore Land Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1954
- Gregor v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.