Legal Opinion

Gregor v. City of Portland

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1928PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, J.

It is well settled in this state that the record of assessment of benefits against property for street improvements must affirmatively show that the procedure prescribed by the legislature must be strictly followed: Jones v. City of Salem, 63 Or. 126 (123 Pac. 1096); Keane v. City of Portland, 115 Or. 1, 7 (235 Pac. 677); In re Board of Directors v. Peck, 91 Or. 33, 45 (178 Pac. 186). Substantial compliance with the provisions of the law after tbe city has acquired jurisdiction of the persons and cause is all that is required: Latourette v. County Court of Clackamas County, 121 Or. 323, 331…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Duniway v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Allen v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Jones v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Austin v. Tillamook CityOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  5. McQuiddy v. VineyardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1895

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Oregon Fire/Police Retirement Committee v. Oregon Public Employes' Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  2. Voth v. FisherOregon Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API