Legal Opinion
Lauderback v. Multnomah County
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided June 3, 1924PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
The term “County Court,” as used in the road law, includes the “board of county commissioners” of Multnomah County: Section 1, Chap. 295, Laws 1917 (§ 4536, Or. L.). Hereafter, in this opinion, we will refer to that board as the “County Court.”
The proposed road is about 3% miles in length and affects the premises of at least thirty-two persons. Of this number, twenty-two were awarded damages by the board of viewers in the sum of $1, and two were awarded nothing. The plaintiffs are numbered among those who were awarded $1.
Defendant, in support of its demurrer, asserts that the plaintiffs’…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- In re Willow CreekOregon Supreme Court · 1914
- Osborne v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Minard v. Douglas CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1881
- State v. DowningOregon Supreme Court · 1901
- Catlin v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1906
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Strawberry Hill 4 Wheelers v. Board of CommissionersOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Kuhnhausen v. StadelmanOregon Supreme Court · 1944
- Bakee Production Credit Ass'n v. Long Creek Meat Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
- SPENCE, ADM'X v. RasmussenOregon Supreme Court · 1951
- Brown v. HillearyOregon Supreme Court · 1930
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.