Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Shutler

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 31, 1936No. Crim. 2863PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHINN, J., pro tem.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction of violation of section 288 of the Penal Code.

By complaint filed in the municipal court, defendant was charged in separate counts with the crimes of kidnaping, rape and violation of section 288 of the Penal Code. He was committed only upon the charges of kidnaping and rape, was charged with those crimes by information, and entered a plea of not guilty. At the commencement of trial the district attorney, with leave of court, filed an amended information accusing the defendant of the additional crime of violation of section 288…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. BirdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. People v. ThalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  3. People v. BarnettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. People v. MalowitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. People v. WyattCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Parks v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. People v. TallmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. People v. FlowersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. People v. CryderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. People v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API