Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Flowers

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 2, 1971No. Crim. 853PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GINSBURG, J. *

Appellant was found guilty of violation of section 245 of the Penal Code, assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury, after trial by jury. He appeals from the judgment based upon the verdict.

The sole issue raised by appellant is the propriety of the allowance of an amendment to the information adding a new count after a mistrial. The appellant was originally charged with violation of section 211 of the Penal Code, robbery, by a complaint filed in the municipal court. After a preliminary examination, he was bound over to superior court on this charge.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. People v. TallmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. People v. StoddardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. People v. CroomsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. People v. MesserlyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. People v. Leonard CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. People v. WittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. People v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. People v. VillagrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API