Legal Opinion

People v. Walker

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 31, 1947No. Crim. 2003PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.

By an information defendant originally was charged (1) with the crime of assault with intent to commit murder, and (2) with the crime of robbery. To each count he pleaded not guilty and subsequently moved to change his plea to not guilty and not guilty by reason of insanity. At the conclusion of the trial and prior to submission of the case to the jury, the court, on its own motion, ordered the district attorney to file an amended information as to count one so as to charge the defendant with assault with a deadly weapon with intent to commit murder. The jury found him guilty of assault as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. McCoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. People v. TallmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. People v. FosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  4. People v. LopezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. People v. ShutlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  2. People v. HeffingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  3. In Re McInturffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. State Ex Rel. Volden v. HaasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  5. People v. ReederCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API