Legal Opinion

State v. Barge

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 2012No. 87230-9PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

278 P.3d 184 (2012)

174 Wn.2d 1006

STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

William Aaron BARGE, Petitioner.

No. 87230-9.

Supreme Court of Washington.

June 6, 2012.

ORDER

¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Madsen and Justices Chambers, Fairhurst, Stephens and González, considered at its June 5, 2012, Motion Calendar, whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b), and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the Petitioner's "Motion to Immediately Grant Review and Grant Requested Relief" is denied. The Petition for Review is granted…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. CatonWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. KOSEWICZWashington Supreme Court · 2012

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  2. State v. SHELMIDINECourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  3. State v. WillhoiteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  4. Smigaj v. Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API