Legal Opinion
State v. SHELMIDINE
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided January 24, 2012No. 40743-4-IIPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPenoyar, C.J.
¶1 Nerissa Shelmidine contests the trial court’s denial of her motion to dismiss her delivery of a controlled substance (ecstasy) charge or, alternatively, for the withdrawal of counsel. She asserts that the State’s plea offer, which was conditioned on her not seeking a confidential informant’s identity, interfered with her right to effective assistance of counsel. We affirm.
FACTS
¶2 On March 3,2010, the State charged Shelmidine with one count of delivery of a controlled substance (ecstasy) with a school bus route stop enhancement. The State alleged that Shelmidine had delivered the controlled…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Weatherford v. BurseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- LK Operating, LLC v. Collection Group, LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- LK Operating, LLC v. Collection Grp., LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- State of Washington v. Timothy Harlan LeonardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016