State v. Campbell
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSiddoway, J.
¶1 This case raises the issue of whether an officer with probable cause to believe that a car contains contraband may seize and hold not only the car for the time reasonably required to obtain a warrant and conduct a search, but also a purse belonging to an occupant as to whom individualized probable cause does not exist. Given the circumstances of this case and the trial court’s unchallenged findings and conclusions, Maya Campbell’s purse fell within the scope of the search warrant that the officers were seeking and obtained. Officers therefore had the authority to deny Ms. Campbell access…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Brendlin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Zurcher v. Stanford DailySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. LadsonWashington Supreme Court · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Emery Hammond v. Stephanie BannickCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- State Of Washington v. Alejandro Anaya-cabreraCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- State Of Washington v. Stephen M. ShellabargerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- State of Washington v. Francisco Javier Munoz QuinteroCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- State of Washington v. Rogelio NunezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.