Legal Opinion

State v. Willhoite

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 17, 2012No. 66614-2-IPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, J.

¶1 When, as here, the facts are undisputed that the defendant did not have a relationship with any of the victims involved in the crime, the defendant is not eligible for a special sex offender sentencing alternative (SSOSA) under the plain language of the statute that requires as a condition of eligibility the existence of a relationship with the victim. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for resentencing.

FACTS

¶2 Robert Willhoite pleaded guilty to one count of possession of depictions of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct and one count of dealing in such depictions. According to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. NewtonWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State v. KinnemanWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. KinnemanWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Of Washington, Appellant/cross-resp v. Cory Pratt, Resp./cross-appellantCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  2. State v. PrattWashington Supreme Court · 2021
  3. State Of Washington v. Ezra Danilo WrightCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API