State v. Willhoite
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, J.
¶1 When, as here, the facts are undisputed that the defendant did not have a relationship with any of the victims involved in the crime, the defendant is not eligible for a special sex offender sentencing alternative (SSOSA) under the plain language of the statute that requires as a condition of eligibility the existence of a relationship with the victim. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for resentencing.
FACTS
¶2 Robert Willhoite pleaded guilty to one count of possession of depictions of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct and one count of dealing in such depictions. According to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. NewtonWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. KinnemanWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. KinnemanWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State Of Washington, Appellant/cross-resp v. Cory Pratt, Resp./cross-appellantCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- State v. PrattWashington Supreme Court · 2021
- State Of Washington v. Ezra Danilo WrightCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020