Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Steele

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1890PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Certiorari to Ionia. (Smith, J.) Plaintiff brings certiorari to review proceedings dissolving an attachment. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

Plaintiff sued out a writ of attachment against the defendant. Defendant filed his petition before the circuit judge of' Ionia county for the dissolution of the attachment. The judge, after a full hearing, dissolved it, and plaintiff brings the proceedings into this Court by certiorari, claiming that the petition is insufficient, and that under the undisputed facts plaintiff had legal cause for suing out the writ.

The affidavit upon which the writ was issued stated that affiant had good reason to believe, and did believe, that William Steele had assigned, disposed of, and concealed his…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Crookston State Bank v. LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  2. Bane v. KeysMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Pierce v. BoyleMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API