Legal Opinion

Pool v. First Nat. Bank of Princeton

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided October 7, 1941PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Yan Sant, Commissioner

— Affirming in part and reversing in part.

The appellee is a banking institution with principal place of business at Princeton, Kentucky. The appellant, R. M. Pool, was its president and in active charge of its affairs until July 1, 1937. While president he borrowed of the hank several thousand dollars. His son, appellant J. M. Pool, borrowed of it $6,150 for which R. M. Pool became surety. All of the loans were evidenced by notes which were renewed from time to time until the principals were paid. The original notes, and perhaps a few renewals,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wallace v. CookCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  2. Davis v. HarringtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  3. Alabama City, G. & A. Ry. Co. v. City of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  4. Bassick Gold Mine Co. v. BeardsleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
  5. New York Trust Co. v. Detroit, T. & I. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Robberson Steel Co. v. HarrellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
  2. Rabon v. State Finance CorporationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1943
  3. United States v. HardyDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1996
  4. Kentucky Home Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. LeitnerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946
  5. Martin v. Pack's Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API