Legal Opinion

Bassick Gold Mine Co. v. Beardsley

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1910No. 6155PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Custer District Court — Hon. Morton S. Bailey, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hill

The right to collect interest, under certain conditions, is the question involved. The action is upon a hook-account provided for by written contract, by which it was agreed that the appellee should furnish certain supplies and perform certain services to and for the appellant at certain fixed prices and under certain conditions. In consideration therefor the appellant agreed and bound itself to pay, on or before the 15th day of each and every calendar month, the amount due and owing to the appellee *276for such, supplies furnished and services rendered during the preceding month. Under this…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. National Bank of the Commonwealth v. Mechanics' National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Stewart v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Cutter v. . the Mayor, Etc., of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1883
  4. Davis v. HarringtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  5. King v. . PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Berger v. QuinteroSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
  2. Bedard v. MartinColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. E.B. Jones Construction Co. v. City & County of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Williams v. Casparis Bros.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. Pool v. First Nat. Bank of PrincetonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API