Legal Opinion

Terri Harrigfeld Sara Harrigfeld v. J.D. Hancock Hancock & Zollinger, a Partnership

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 30, 2003No. 01-35525PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER CERTIFYING QUESTION OF LAW TO THE IDAHO SUPREME COURT

ORDER

Terri Harrigfeld and Sarah Harrigfeld (collectively “the Harrigfelds”) appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the District of Idaho granting summary judgment on their legal malpractice claim to defendant-appellees J.D. Hancock (“Hancock”) and the law firm Smith, Hancock & Zollinger (collectively “the Defendants”) on the ground that no attorney-client relationship existed between the Harrigfelds and the Defendants. We vacate submission and certify the legal question dispositive of this appeal to the Idaho…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sun Valley Potatoes, Inc. v. Rosholt, Robertson & TuckerIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Jordan v. BeeksIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Johnson v. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Lamb v. ManweilerIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Marias v. MaranoIdaho Supreme Court · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Terri Harrigfeld Sara Harrigfeld v. J.D. Hancock Hancock & Zollinger, a PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API