Crockett v. Sahara Realty Corp.

OPINION

The appellants brought this action against respondents to recover damages allegedly resulting from respondents’ “tortious interference with appellants’ prospective economic advantage”, i.e., the obtaining of a commission on the sale of real property. The court below, on a motion for summary judgment, entered judgment in favor of respondents and dismissed the action. This appeal resulted.

THE FACTS

The appellants in the summer of 1974 contacted Fletcher Jones, who was interested in purchasing real property in Clark County. The case is focused on a piece of realty known as the “Harrison…