Chalfant v. Haralson
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hart, C. J.,
(after stating the facts). The principal ground relied upon for a reversal of the judgment is that the verdict is so clearly against the weight of the evidence as to shook the sense of justice of a reasonable person, and that the ease is controlled by the rule of law announced in Oliver v. State, 34 Ark. 632, and Singer Manufacturing Co. v. Rogers, 70 Ark. 385, 67 S. W. 75, 68 S. W. 153. In so far as it might be said that these cases sustain a holding that this court will set aside the verdict of a jury where there is any substantial evidence to sustain it, they are against the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Catlett v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1893
- St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. EllenwoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
- Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. v. BarrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
- Saint Louis-San Francisco Rd. Co. v. PearsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
- Oliver v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1879
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Arkansas Motor Coaches, Ltd. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
- Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. v. HendersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
- National Life & Accident Insurance v. BlantonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
- Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. v. BriganceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
- Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. HillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.