Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Hill

Appellee recovered judgment for the sum of $500 to compensate the injury, pain and suffering occasioned by drinking a bottle of Coca-Cola containing particles of glass. For the reversal of the judgment, it is argued only that the verdict is so clearly against the preponderance of the evidence as to shock one’s sense of justice. The case of Chalfant v. Haralson, 176 Ark. 375, 3 S. W. (2d) 38, is cited along with other cases, in support of this contention..

Before reciting the testimony, we restate the rule by which we must view it as announced in the case cited. We there said that we would not…