Legal Opinion

McCornick & Co. v. Gem State Oil & Products Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1923PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ADAIR, District Judge.

— The plaintiff instituted this action against the defendant and appellant upon three certain written instruments known as trade acceptances. Three causes of action were set up, each having as its basis one of said papers, which were in the principal sums of $1,000, $1,000 and $593.54, respectively, and each was in the following language, except as to amounts:

“Date 5-3-20.
“No. -. $1000.00
“On July 8, 1920, pay to the order of Utah Rubber Co. One Thousand & No 100 Dollars value received and charge the same to the account of
“UTAH RUBBER CO.
“J. W. FRANCIS.

*472‘‘To Gem State Oil…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Chicago Railway Equipment Co. v. Merchants' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Page v. FordOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Merrill v. HurleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Wilson v. CampbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Des Moines Savings Bank v. ArthurSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Paepcke v. PaineMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Continental National Bank & Trust Co. v. StirlingIdaho Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Old Colony Trust Co. v. StumpelNew York Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Wakem v. SchneiderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  5. First Bank of Marianna v. Havana Canning Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API