Legal Opinion
Security Etc. Bk. v. Southern Etc. Bk.
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 28, 1925No. Docket No. 4012PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The principal question presented for decision upon this appeal is whether or not, under the facts of the case, a collecting bank is legally liable to a drawee bank for moneys paid upon forged checks by the former, which had no means of determining the payor's signature, after their submission to, and honor by, the latter, through…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- President of the Bank of the United States v. President of the Bank of GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
- First Nat. Bank of Washington v. WhitmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- National Exchange Bank of Tiffin v. WileySupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Union Trust Co. v. McGintyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Union Tool Co. v. Farmers & Merchants National Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ermolieff v. R. K. O. Radio Pictures, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Security Pacific National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- CIT Corporation v. PanacCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Central National Bank v. First & Merchants National BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1938
- American National Bank v. StanfillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.