Legal Opinion

Douglas A. Guilmette v. State of Indiana

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 2014No. 71S04-1310-CR-705PublishedCited by 108 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MASSA, Justice.

This appeal presents us with a single question: must police have a warrant before subjecting lawfully seized evidence to laboratory testing if that evidence is unrelated to the crime for which the defendant is in custody? We think not, and thus we affirm the trial court.

Facts and Procedural History

On the evening of September 13, 2010, Doug Guilmette and his co-worker Greg Piechocki were visiting the home of their employer, Kevin Rieder. Around. 12:30 a.m., Rieder took a sleeping pill and went to sleep in another room with the door closed and the fan on high. Sometime later,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Litchfield v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Kevin M. Clark v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Akins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Sears v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by108 opinions

  1. Jonathan D. Carpenter v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Derrick Weedman v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Timmie Bradley v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Will Thomas v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Thomas Pinner v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2017

103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API