Legal Opinion
United States v. Wade
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review
Decided March 24, 1983No. Misc. Dkt. No. 82-19PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARR, Judge:
The United States has petitioned the Court to issue a writ of mandamus compelling the Respondent military judge, Captain M. Burt Wade, JAGC, USN, to reverse his holding in the case of United States v. Vining, that Rule 312(d) Mil.R.Evid. mandates the suppression of laboratory results of a urine sample obtained as a result of a compulsory unit-wide urinalysis “inspection.”
On 27 July 1982, the Commanding Officer, Naval Air Station, Cecil Field, Florida, pursuant to prior existing guidelines, requested authorization from his second-echelon commander, Commander-in-Chief, U.S. Atlantic…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Will v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. HollandSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Glidden Co. v. ZdanokSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ex Parte FaheySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Murray v. HaldemanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- San Antonio Express-News v. MorrowUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996
- United States v. LemoineU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
- United States v. AustinU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
- United States v. MitchellU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1983