Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Mitchell

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided March 28, 1983No. Miscellaneous Docket No. 82-17Published

1DissentSanders, Senior Judge

In arriving at his decision to bar the results of the urinalysis the trial judge relied on Military Rules of Evidence 313 and 312. The former requires that an inspection be conducted in a reasonable fashion and comply with Rule 312, if applicable. The latter circumscribes the use of evidence obtained when an individual is required to ingest a substance for the purpose of compelling the bodily elimination of the evidence. Right or wrong, the military judge’s application of these rules to the facts of the case was not the product of a clear distortion of the English language nor was it contrary…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dettinger v. United StatesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  2. United States v. LabellaU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1982
  3. United States v. WadeU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API