Aetna Building & Loan Ass'n v. Williams
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Kay County; W. M. Bowles, Judge. Action by the First National Bank of Ponca City against Nathaniel Williams and others. The Aetna Building & Loan Association, defendant, filed a cross-complaint. From an order setting aside a default judgment under -the cross-complaint, the association brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtTuenee, J.
On December 12, 1908, the First National Bank of Ponca City, defendant in error,, plaintiff below, sued Nathaniel L. Williams and Sara L. Williams to foreclose a mortgage given by them to secure a debt of $770.63, evidenced by promissory note dated January 12, 1906, on certain lots in Ponca City. Aetna Building & Loan Association, plaintiff in error, and the Ponca State Bank were made parties defendant. On January 11, 1909, the loan association filed a general denial, and by way of cross-complaint set up and prayed the foreclosure of a mortgage executed to them by the same parties on the same…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McCulloch v. DodgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
- Freeman v. AmbroseWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- Town of Byars v. SproulsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Merle & Heaney Manufacturing Co. v. WallaceNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Smith v. LiveseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1902
3Cited by9 opinions
- Chivers v. Board of Com'rs of Johnston CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Pennsylvania Co. v. PotterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- City of Eufaula v. AhrensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- W. L. Moody & Co. v. Freeman-Sipes Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Korimer v. CollinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.