Legal Opinion

Smith v. Livesey

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 3, 1902PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dixon, J.

The plaintiffs having regularly entered judgment

by default against the defendants in the Supreme Court, the defendants applied to that court to open the judgment, on the ground that the default was due to the neglect of their attorneys and they had a meritorious defence which should be submitted to a jury. The court refused to open the judgment, and thereupon the defendants sued out this Avrit of error, contending that such refusal was erroneous in law.

By the common law an application to open a judgment regularly entered was addressed wholly…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Central Railroad v. TunisonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bates v. Nevada Savings and Loan AssociationNevada Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Aetna Building & Loan Ass'n v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Palm Beach Mercantile Co. v. IversNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  4. In Re the Application of LongoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API