W. L. Moody & Co. v. Freeman-Sipes Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Garvin County; R. McMillan, Judge. . Action by W. E. Moody & Co. against Ereeman-Sipes Company and W. M. Freeman. From an order vacating a default judgment, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtHayes, J.
Plaintiff in error, who was plaintiff below, has brought this proceeding to have reviewed an order of the trial court, vacating and setting aside a judgment upon default, and permitting defendants in error, defendants below, to hie their answer and defend against the action. Such an order is not a final order, but is interlocutory, from which no appeal lies to this court. Aetna Bldg. & Loan Ass’n v. Williams et al., 26 Okla. 191, 108 Pac. 1100; Maddle v. Beavers, 24 Okla. 703, 104 Pac. 909; W. L. Moody & Co. v. Freeman & Williams et al., 24 Okla. 701, 104 Pac. 30; Town of Byars v. Sprouls, 24…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Town of Byars v. SproulsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- W. L. Moody & Co. v. Freeman & WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Aetna Building & Loan Ass'n v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Maddle v. BeaversSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
3Cited by7 opinions
- Vann v. Union Central Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Pennsylvania Co. v. PotterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- City of Eufaula v. AhrensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Berger Mfg. v. School Dist. No. 10 of Muskogee Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Rahl v. Marlow State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.