City of Eufaula v. Ahrens
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, McIntosh County; Preslie B. Cole, Judge. Condemnation proceedings by the City of Eufaula against Kate S. Ahrens and others. On motion of defendants the report of the commissioners was set aside and a new appraisement ordered, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtHardy, J.
The city of Eufaüla, a municipal corporation, instituted proceedings to condemn certain lands within its corporate limits for street purposes. The- proceedings were regularly conducted according to statute, resulting in the appointment of commissioners, who inspected said property and assessed the damages sustained by the owners thereof, and made a report in writing to the clerk of the district court in which the proceedings were pending, as required by law. Thereafter, upon motion of the property owners alleging ' that the commissioners had viewed the property and appraised the damages…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Town of Byars v. SproulsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Leavenworth Terminal Railway & Bridge Co. v. AtchisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
- Fletcher v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- W. L. Moody & Co. v. Freeman & WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Matter of Petition of N.Y. H.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1885
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Town of Ames v. WybrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- Wrightsman v. Southwestern Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Owens v. Oklahoma Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- Young v. Seaway Pipeline, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. LeVanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.