Sonotone Corp. v. Ladd
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
The circuit court, in dismissing the plea in abatement, appears to have considered the provisions of the contract and the purported notice of termination, which were properly before the court on the motion for summary judgment, but which were not incorporated in the plea in abatement. In their briefs and upon oral argument here the parties have argued the matter virtually as if those facts were a part of the plea. Under the circumstances, we will consider the matter in the same light, and will treat the part of the order which dismisses the plea as an order sustaining a demurrer to the plea…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Matter of Lipman (Haeuser Shellac Co.)New York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Valentine v. Patrick Warren Construction Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Kilcoyne v. TrauschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
- Stephens v. WheelerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
- Strong v. Shawano Canning Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Madison v. Frank Lloyd Wright FoundationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Eastern Marine Corporation, Owner of the S/s Eastern Argo v. Fukaya Trading Co., S.A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Raynor v. Burroughs Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1968
- Ashker v. Aurora Medical Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2013
- International Trading Co. v. J. C. Penney Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970