Legal Opinion

Strong v. Shawano Canning Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1961PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, J.

The defendants rely upon two paragraphs appearing in tire contract as defenses to the claim for damages. The tenant referred to in the contract is Shawano Farms, Inc., and the landlord is the plaintiff. The first of said paragraphs appears in section 3 of the contract, and reads as follows:

“Should tenant be unable profitably to harvest or utilize for canning purposes the sweet-corn crop or any part thereof, the landlord’s rental compensation as to the crop or part thereof not so harvested or utilized shall consist only of his right to use such crop for the feeding of livestock.”

The defendants…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nolop v. SpettelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Megal v. KohlhardtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Ebenreiter v. FreemanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Skelly Oil Co. v. PetersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Capital Investments, Inc. v. Whitehall Packing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Dieter v. Chrysler Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Marion v. ORSON'S CAMERA CENTERS, INC.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  4. North Gate Corp. v. National Food Stores, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  5. First Bank & Trust v. Firstar Information Services, Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API