Legal Opinion

State v. Rothenberger

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1968No. 39505, 39506PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

Ronald Dean Rothenberger and Samuel Eugene Pernar each appeals from a conviction of second-degree burglary. The appeals were argued together. The burglary occurred late on November 1, or early on November 2, 1966, in Seattle, Washington, and the appellants admit that they were involved in it. They urge, however, that under the rules by which the game of “Cops and Robbers” is presently being played, they are entitled to “get home free.”

The sole assignment of error on each appeal is that the trial court failed to grant a motion to suppress “all evidence seized as a result of the unlawful…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Joseph N. D'Argento and James A. Caparusso v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State v. MennegarWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. EllwoodCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  3. State v. HillSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
  4. People v. BrendlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. EserjoseWashington Supreme Court · 2011

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API