Legal Opinion

People v. Brendlin

California Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 2008No. S123133PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAXTER, J.

The issue presented in this case is whether evidence seized in a search incident to a lawful arrest based upon a valid outstanding warrant nonetheless must be suppressed because the discovery of the warrant occurred during an unlawful traffic stop. Case law from other state and federal courts uniformly holds that the discovery of an outstanding arrest warrant prior to a search incident to arrest constitutes an intervening circumstance that may—and, in the absence of purposeful or flagrant police misconduct, will—attenuate the taint of the antecedent unlawful traffic stop. We…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Brendlin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. United States v. CrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Hudson v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. State v. EliasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  2. State of Texas v. Mazuca, AlvaroCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
  3. State v. ShawSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
  4. People v. SchmitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  5. People v. EvansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API