Legal Opinion
State v. Eserjose
Washington Supreme Court
Decided June 30, 2011No. 82491-6PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.
¶1 We granted direct review of James Eserjose’s conviction on a charge of second degree burglary. He assigns error to the trial court’s conclusion that a confession he gave to a deputy sheriff was admissible at trial. We affirm the trial court.
I
¶2 In the early morning hours of August 29, 2008, the Latte On Your Way coffee shop in Kitsap County was burglarized. When Kitsap County Deputy Sheriff Heather Wright responded to the shop’s burglar alarm, she discovered signs of forcible entry; however, aside from shards of broken glass on the floor and an opened cash register drawer and freezer door,…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- State v. EserjoseWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. MayfieldWashington Supreme Court · 2019
- David Wright v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. VanNessCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- State v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 2013
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.