Legal Opinion

Seymore v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 2007No. 05-179PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VOIGT, Chief Justice.

[11] This is an appeal from an escape conviction. The appellant contends that the jury was improperly instructed and that the prosecutor committed misconduct during the trial. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

FACTS

[T2] On December 24, 2003, during probation revocation proceedings in another matter, the appellant was ordered into placement with Frontier Corrections System (FCS) in Cheyenne, Wyoming. As part of the FCS intake process, the appellant signed an "understanding of escape" form that advised him of the types of actions considered by FCS to constitute…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles J. SANCHEZ, Jr., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  4. United States v. Michael S. Polizzi, United States of America v. Joseph E. MatrangaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. Schmunk v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Granzer v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Heywood v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Ewing v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Yellowbear v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Jaime Solis v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API