Metzger v. State

HILL, Justice.

Appellant, David Metzger (Metzger), seeks review of his convictions and sentences for two counts of indecent liberties: -with a child. Metzger asserts that witnesses were erroneously permitted to vouch for the credibility of the victim, that the trial court abused its discretion in denying a motion for mistrial, that the jury was not adequately or clearly instructed, and that the prosecutor engaged in prejudicial misconduct throughout the trial, We conclude that no reversible errors occurred and, hence, we affirm.

ISSUES

Metzger raises these issues:

I. Did the trial court abuse its…