Legal Opinion
Romans v. Michigan Department of Human Services
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 16, 2012No. 10-2174PublishedCited by 106 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McKEAGUE, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Jerry Romans, a Caucasian male, alleges that Defendant Michigan Department of Human Services violated Title VII by discriminating against him based on his race. Plaintiff further alleges that Defendant violated the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”) by interfering with his FMLA-leave rights and retaliating against him for his exercise of FMLAprotected rights. The district court granted summary judgment to Defendant as to both Plaintiffs Title VII and FMLA claims. Plaintiff appeals. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the district court’s decision…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Tjymas Blackmore v. Kalamazoo CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by106 opinions
- Lichtenstein v. University of Pittsburgh Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Carole Tingle v. Arbors at HilliardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Everett Chattman v. Toho Tenax America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Gianni-Paolo Ferrari v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.