Legal Opinion
Carole Tingle v. Arbors at Hilliard
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 29, 2012No. 11-3494PublishedCited by 261 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVID M. LAWSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Carole Tingle alleged in a complaint that she was disciplined and ultimately terminated from employment by defendant Arbors at Hilliard, a nursing home in Hilliard, Ohio, in retaliation for speaking with investigators from the Ohio Department of Health following the death of a nursing-home resident. She brought her claim under Ohio Revised Code § 3721.24(A), which prohibits retaliation for participating in a Department of Health investigation, and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Arbors at Hilliard denied any retaliatory motive and…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by261 opinions
- Cynthia Miles v. S. Central Human Resource AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Gianni-Paolo Ferrari v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Paula Babb v. Maryville Anesthesiologists, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Williams v. City of BurnsTennessee Supreme Court · 2015
- Brown v. Board of EducationDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2014
256 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.