Legal Opinion

Grant v. Cuomo

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1986PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Edward H. Lehner, J.

Social Services Law § 409-a (1) (a) provides that a "social services official shall provide preventive services to a child and his family, in accordance with the child’s service plan as required by section four hundred nine-e * * * upon a finding by such official that the child will be placed or continued in foster care unless such services are provided and that it is reasonable to believe that by providing such services the child will be able to remain with or be returned to his family.”

The city defendants take the position that "there is no legal…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. W. T. Grant Co. v. SrogiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Klostermann v. CuomoNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. City of New York v. City Civil Service CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Jones v. BeameNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. National Organization for Women v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1974

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Martin A. v. GrossNew York Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Heard v. CuomoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. Heard v. CuomoNew York Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Grant v. CuomoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API