Legal Opinion

Heard v. Cuomo

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*259OPINION OF THE COURT

Edward H. Lehner, J.

After trial the court finds that the success of in-patient care and treatment given to mentally ill persons is in large part dependent on their being able after discharge to reside in stable housing with available supportive services. A discharge to the street, to a congregate public shelter, or to a "flop house” would not constitute effective "rehabilitation” required to be given to such persons pursuant to section 7.07 (c) of the Mental Hygiene Law as these places are not appropriate residences for them in light of the dangers involved in such living…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Klostermann v. CuomoNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Grant v. CuomoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. Grant v. CuomoNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Grant v. CuomoNew York Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Love v. KochAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cerbelli v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2009
  2. New York Ass'n of Convenience Stores v. UrbachNew York Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Heard v. CuomoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API