Legal Opinion
Jones v. Beame
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 13, 1978PublishedCited by 96 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Chief Judge Breitel.
These two appeals share a common quality: in each the plaintiffs would embroil the courts in the administration of programs the primary responsibility for which lies in the executive branch of government. In each the courts are obliged to decline the invitation. Accepting the responsibility would violate the constitutional scheme for the distribution of powers among the three branches of government and involve the judicial branch in responsibilities it is ill-equipped to assume.
In the Jones appeal plaintiffs are private persons and organizations…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- James v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Abrams v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- United States v. SissonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by96 opinions
- Klostermann v. CuomoNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Donohue v. Copiague Union Free School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Board of Education v. NyquistNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Nys Law Enforcement Employees v. CuomoNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Marisol A. by Next Friend Forbes v. GiulianiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.