Legal Opinion
Martin A. v. Gross
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 27, 1987PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Elliott Wilk, J.
The motions in Martin and Bill A. v Gross (Martin and Bill *215A.) (index No. 24388/85) and Cosentino v Perales (Cosentino) (index No. 43236/85), which challenge defendants’ failure to provide sufficient services to avoid the imposition of foster care placement for children, are consolidated for disposition.
The plaintiffs in Martin and Bill A. (supra) include Martin, Bill, Laura and Vincent A. and their mother Aurora A.; Dakinya B. and her mother Lucille B.; Pamela C. and her mother Bonnie C.; Julie D. and her grandmother Elvia D.; and Jim E. These children and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mark G. v. SabolAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Martin A. v. GrossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Martin A. v. GrossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Gardner v. ConstantineNew York Supreme Court · 1989
- Martin A. v. GrossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991