Legal Opinion

Fields v. Fields

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 23, 1939Published

1Opinion of the Court

Per "Curiam. —

The briefs filed by plaintiff in error in this case violate Rule 32 of this' Court in that they are typewritten on thin, translucent paper in blue type and are, therefore, hurtful to the eyes of those required to read the same.

Questions 7, 8 and 9 as stated in the brief are so stated as not to comply with amended Rule 20.

See Smith v. Presha, 101 Fla. 1272, 134 Sou. 44; St. Andrews Bay Lbr. Co. v. Bernard, 102 Fla. 389, 135 Sou. 831; Adams v. Burns, 119 Fla. 770, 161 Sou. 712.

Unless the Plaintiff in Error shall file here within fifteen (15) days of the entry of this Order, brief…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. St. Andrews Bay Lumber Co. v. BernardSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  2. Smith v. PreshaSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  3. Adams v. BurnsSupreme Court of Florida · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API