Smith v. Presha
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.-
-In this case brief has been filed by appellant which fails to comply with amended Rule 20 adopted November 5, 1930, in that the brief comprises more than Twelve (12) pages and does not have an index of its contents nor an alphabetical list of authorities therein cited attached thereto, nor does the first division of the brief contain a statement of the questions involved, though they are stated elsewhere in the brief.
Section “g” provides:
“When no brief has been filed by the plaintiff in error or appellant, within the time required by, or in accordance with, the rules hereinabove…
2Cited by2 opinions
- State v. HodgesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
- Fields v. FieldsSupreme Court of Florida · 1939