Legal Opinion
St. Andrews Bay Lumber Co. v. Bernard
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided July 7, 1931PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
— The writ of error in this case should be dismissed for failure of plaintiff in error to comply with rule 20 of the rules governing practice in this court, as amended November fifth, 1930. Amended Rule 20 reads in part as follows:
“(b) The first or main brief filed in behalf of plaintiff in error or appellant shall consist of three major divisions: First, a statement of the questions involved; second a concise history or statement of the case, that is a condensed summary of the pleadings and evidence on which he relies to support his contentions; and third, the argument; all as hereinafter…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- J. Ray Arnold Lumber Co. v. CarterSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
3Cited by10 opinions
- Smith v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Ins.Supreme Court of Florida · 1934
- St. Andrews Bay Lumber Co. v. BernardSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
- Reese v. LevinSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
- Carr v. Cole, Et Vir.Supreme Court of Florida · 1935
- Croft v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.