Legal Opinion

Adams v. Burns

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 7, 1935PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBuford, J.

This cause is before us on a motion to dismiss because of the alleged failure of the plaintiff in error to comply with amended rule 20 in the preparation of brief submitted in the cause in that the plaintiff in error has failed to state the questions involved so “phrased that the point of law intended for solution may plainly appear.”

Questions B, C, D, E and F are not phrased in such manner that the points of law intended for solution can be said to appear. Each question is so framed as to require a perusal of the transcript of the record to determine what point of law is intended to be…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fields v. FieldsSupreme Court of Florida · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API