Legal Opinion
Ohio Casualty Insurance v. Hubbard
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 18, 1984No. B006659PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McCLOSKY, J.
Plaintiff The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company (Ohio) is the insurer of defendant Barbara Hubbard. In this action Ohio seeks a declaration that it no longer has a duty to indemnify or defend Ms. Hubbard with respect to the remaining claims in the action entitled “Angeline Johnson and Estella Smith, on behalf of themselves and the general public under section 17204 of the Business and Professions Code v. Barbara Hubbard and Does 1 through 100. (Sup. Ct. No. C 412430.) After a trial by court sitting without a jury, the court rendered a judgment which in pertinent part provided:
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Northwestern National Casualty Company of Milwaukee, Wisconsin v. Edward A. McNulty and Walter Scott SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- Hogan v. Midland National InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Peterson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Miller v. Elite InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Buss v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Royal Globe Insurance v. WhitakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- B & E Convalescent Center v. State Compensation Insurance FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Mt. Hawley Insurance v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- J.B. Aguerre, Inc. v. American Guarantee & Liability InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.