David Tunick, Inc. v. Kornfeld
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
EDELSTEIN, District Judge:
This action arises from Mr. E.W. Korn-feld’s and Galerie Kornfeld und Cie’s (“defendants”) sale of a signed Picasso print to plaintiff, David Tunick, Inc. (“Tunick” or “plaintiff’). Plaintiff alleges that defendants sold Tunick a print of Le Minotourmachie (the “Print”) which defendants represented was signed by Pablo Picasso but which, in fact, bears a forged signature. Defendants have filed various counterclaims against David Tunick. Defendants deny that the signature on the Print is forged and contend that plaintiff, David Tunick, Inc., and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- County of Suffolk v. Long Island Lighting Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1988
- American Steel Products Corp. v. Penn Central Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
3Cited by5 opinions
- Magee v. Paul Revere Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1997
- New York v. Solvent Chemical Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 2002
- Frederick v. Columbia UniversityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Feliciano v. County of SuffolkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2007
- Marsch v. Rensselaer CountyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2003