Legal Opinion
New York v. Solvent Chemical Co.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided September 27, 2002No. 83-CV-1401CPublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
INTRODUCTION
CURTIN, District Judge.
Presently before the court is defendant and third-party plaintiff Solvent Chemical Company’s (“Solvent”) motion pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b)(4)(C) seeking an order compelling third-party defendants, Reco-chem, Inc. and Joseph Kuchar (collectively, “Recochem”) to pay the reasonable fees and expenses incurred by Dr. E. Bruce Nauman, Solvent’s expert, in responding to Reeo-ehem’s request for deposition. Item 1007. Solvent asks the court to order Recochem to pay $8,855.06 for Dr. Nauman’s time and expenses pursuant to the deposition. Item 1009, 116. Solvent…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Oliveri v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Rommy Revson, Plaintiff-Counterclaim-Defendant-Appellant, Judd Burstein v. Cinque & Cinque, P.C., Defendant-Counterclaimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Mannarino v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2003
- Lamere v. New York State Office for the AgingDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2004
- Broushet v. Target Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- Korabik v. Arcelormittal Plate LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Guantanamera Cigar Co. v. Corporacion Habanos, S.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.