Legal Opinion
Marsch v. Rensselaer County
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided October 10, 2003No. 01-CV-1219(DNH/DRH)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
HOMER, United States Magistrate Judge.
Presently pending is the motion of defendants Rensselaer County, Daniel V. Keating, Robert Loveridge, Jason Dessingire, James Suriano, Jason Valente and CO Cachioli (collectively the “County defendants”) for an order pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 35 compelling plaintiff Paul F. Marsch (“Marsch”) to submit to a mental examination and for costs and attorney’s fees. Docket No. 78.1 Marsch opposes the motion. Docket Nos. 82, 83. For the reasons which follow, the County defendants’ motion is granted in part and denied in part.
I.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Williams v. Board of County Commissioners of the Unified Government of Wyandotte CountyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2000
- Di Bari v. Incaica Cia Armadora, S.A.District Court, E.D. New York · 1989
- David Tunick, Inc. v. KornfeldDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
3Cited by2 opinions
- Newman v. San Joaquin Delta Community College DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2011
- United States v. WilsonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012